Background: Despite decades of standardized sepsis protocols, fluid resuscitation practices remain variable across hospital settings. At our community hospital, compliance with the 30 mL/kg fluid requirement for severe sepsis and septic shock patients lagged behind national benchmarks, driven by inconsistent documentation, variable order set use, and lack of confidence in assessing fluid responsiveness. Standardized bundles often fail to account for individualized patient physiology and provider workflow barriers. Recognizing these gaps, we launched a multidisciplinary innovation project aimed at improving SEP-1 fluid resuscitation compliance by integrating point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), refining documentation practices, and empowering frontline teams to make data-driven fluid decisions.
Purpose: To improve SEP-1 bundle adherence and optimize sepsis fluid resuscitation by reducing documentation gaps, streamlining workflows, and promoting appropriate use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) when it can meaningfully guide fluid management decisions, using a multidisciplinary, data-driven quality improvement approach.
Description: Using the DMAIC (Define/Measure/Analyze/Improve/Control) framework, the team reviewed 18 months of sepsis encounters across the ED, ICU, and general medicine units to identify barriers to SEP-1 compliance (baseline 66%). A retrospective chart review pinpointed patients who met severe sepsis criteria and qualified for 30 cc/kg fluid resuscitation but did not receive it. Clinician surveys (n=32; nurses, hospitalists, residents) captured the “voice of the customer” and revealed key challenges: lack of documented rationale for withheld fluids, inconsistent order-set use, and limited application of POCUS where it could meaningfully guide fluid responsiveness. Interventions targeted these gaps through standardized POCUS training for > 40 clinicians, smart EMR templates requiring rationale before withholding fluids, and focused provider education reinforcing evidence-based, equity-driven resuscitation. Outcome measures: SEP-1 compliance, documentation quality, and POCUS utilization were tracked with control charts over six months to assess sustained improvement.
Conclusions: Following implementation, SEP-1 fluid compliance improved by 41%, and documentation of rationale before withholding fluids increased to 90%. POCUS use became targeted and evidence-driven, helping to objectify bedside assessments and align clinical decisions with documentation. POCUS proved especially useful in patients with heart failure or end-stage renal disease; groups where fluid decisions are often deferred due to clinical uncertainty. By offering real-time insight into volume status, it enabled personalized, data-driven resuscitation and mitigated the risk of both under- and over-resuscitation. In sepsis patients responsive to intravenous fluids, this approach supported timely and appropriate resuscitation, reducing delays and preventing early escalation of care to the ICU for vasopressor initiation. This innovation illustrates how uniting bedside assessment, transparent documentation, and streamlined workflows can optimize sepsis fluid management, strengthen clinical confidence, and transform care from rigid protocol adherence to precision-guided collaboration – embodying the very mission of hospital medicine: transforming evidence into action, protocols into judgment, and teams into instruments of meaningful change.
.jpg)
.jpg)